Durham University
Programme and Module Handbook

Undergraduate Programme and Module Handbook 2005-2006 (archived)

Module FREN3251: WRITING AND CRIMINALITY

Department: MODERN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES (FRENCH)

FREN3251: WRITING AND CRIMINALITY

Type Open Level 3 Credits 20 Availability Not available in 2005/06 Module Cap None. Location Durham

Prerequisites

  • French Language 2 (FREN2051 or FREN2071) OR an equivalent qualification to the satisfaction of the Chairman/Chairwoman of the Board of Studies in MLAC or his/her representative.

Corequisites

  • Modern European Languages, Combined Honours and all Joint and 'with' programmes: French Language 4 (FREN3041). Others: see Chairman/Chairwoman of the Board of Studies in MLAC or his/her representative.

Excluded Combination of Modules

  • Medieval and 16th Century Literature (FREN2031)

Aims

  • To explore the problematic nature of the relationship between narrator and reader of a literary text by studying the 'cas limite' of texts written by convicted criminals (Francois Villon and Jean Genet).
  • To introduce students to the main features of reception theory and to prompt critical reconsideration of 'literary history'.

Content

  • This module examines the work of two French writers who have been assimilated into the 'canon' of French literature despite being convicted criminals.
  • Brushes with the law [sometimes resulting in imprisonment] marked the biographies of both Francois Villon and Jean Genet.
  • their works feature, as protagonists, young men who revolt against or subvert the established order of the day while breaking society's taboos.
  • Villon's satirical verse 'Testament' and Genet's 'Journal du voleur', although separated by almost five hundred years, raise similar problems: how can readers, faced with disturbing, shocking or offensive material, safeguard their own values, and what role should an author's biography be allowed to play in the interpretation of her/her works? Attention is also paid to the reception of both authors insofar as it may represent a desire to play down the subversive nature of their texts and reclaim them for general readership of the 'classics'.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:
  • By the end of the module students should have:
  • a critical understanding of the relationship between narrator and reader in literary texts, together with a familiarity with the main theories of reader-response,
  • an awareness of manipulative techniques used by authors/narrators and a healthy scepticism about taking authorial statements at face value.
Subject-specific Skills:
    Key Skills:
    • Skills in the active and critical reading of texts.
    • The ability to document and defend a point of view.
    • The ability to evaluate, compare, synthesise and present conflicting critical responses to literary texts.
    • Essay and commentary writing skills.

    Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

    • Weekly lectures with historical, biographical and theoretical starting points for the analysis of extracts from both authors in seminars.
    • Fortnightly seminars will enable students, through guided close reading of extracts, to become familiar with manipulative strategies on the part of narrators, and to reflect critically on their own role in the relationship between the literary text and its readers.
    • Discussion of formative work will enable students to evaluate their progress relative to the published aims and objectives of the module, and to test and refine their own critical responses to the texts and relevant secondary material.

    Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

    Activity Number Frequency Duration Total/Hours
    Lectures 22 Weekly 1 hour 22
    Seminars 11 Fortnightly 1 hour 11
    Preparation and Reading 167
    Total 200

    Summative Assessment

    Component: Examination Component Weighting: 60%
    Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
    two-hour written examination 100%
    Component: Commentary Component Weighting: 40%
    Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
    2000 word literary commentary 100%

    Formative Assessment:

    1 practical literary commentary/essay on each author.


    Attendance at all activities marked with this symbol will be monitored. Students who fail to attend these activities, or to complete the summative or formative assessment specified above, will be subject to the procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University