Postgraduate Programme and Module Handbook 2012-2013 (archived)
Module SGIA41715: METHODOLOGY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
Department: Government and International Affairs
SGIA41715: METHODOLOGY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
Type | Tied | Level | 4 | Credits | 15 | Availability | Available in 2012/13 | Module Cap | None. |
---|
Prerequisites
- None.
Corequisites
- None.
Excluded Combination of Modules
- None.
Aims
- The module aims to familiarsie students with debates about thje conduct, methods and foundations of the social sciences, particularly political science and international relations. It provides knowledge and tools to critically review scholarship in specific areas within the discipline. It thereby promotes and offers training in the exercise of critical judgement of actual social-scientific works encountered in the M.A. programmes offered by the School of Government and International Affairs and in postgraduate research in the School, as well as in other postgraduate contexts. The module construes 'methododlogy' in more philosophical terms than ' methods', as a basis for reflection on choice of method within substantive research.
Content
- Module topics follow a sequence that moves from general and foundational issues concerning the nature of science and social science to a focus on prevailing approaches in political science and international relations. An indicative programme of seminars is therefore as follows:
- 1. Positivism
- 2. Falsification and Paradigms
- 3. The Distintiveness of the Social Sciences
- 4. Behaviour and Values in Political Science
- 5. Political Culture Research: Positivism and Interpretivism
- 6. Rational Choice Theory
- 7. Social Construction and Deconstruction
Learning Outcomes
Subject-specific Knowledge:
- By the end of the module students should have:
- The ability to master the complex and specialised area of knowledge and skills concerning:-
- the debates and controversies in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of social scienecs and their bearing on the conduct of political science and international relations.
- selected approaches in political science and international relations, examined from the point of view of their philosophical foundations, their disciplinary evolution, and thier methods of inquiry.
Subject-specific Skills:
- the ability to recognise, analye and account for the philosophical and methodological foundations of substantive work in political science and international relations.
- the ability to use and critisise the philosophophical and methodological arguments in the evaluation of substantive work in political science and international relations using appropriatley specialised and advanced skills.
- the ability to assess methodologies in support of student's own work.
Key Skills:
- independent thought and judgment in analysing and critiquing existing scholarship on the subject area and in evaluating its contribution.
- the ability to work to a deadline and complete written work within word limits.
- writing a substantial essay in appropriate scolarly style and format.
- the ability to seek out and use relevent data sources, including electronics and bibliographic sources.
Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module
- The module is taught by means of a series of 2-hour seminars in which students (either singly or in pairs) make presentations to the class, accompanied by briefing notes, followed by class discussion guided by the teacher.
- Formative feedback is given on class presentations using a proforma and feedback via proforma is also provided for the 1,500 word essay.
- Summative assessment is via a terminal essay of 4,000 words, on a subject on which the student has already given a presentation. In general terms, the contrual of 'methodology' indicated above demands a discursive approach with an emphasis on class discussion and the testing of its results via essays.
- Specifically:
- Presentations: encourage reading and research and require the structuring of the results in a digestible format.
- Class discussion: enables critical assessment of presentations and allows gaps and errors to be identified and rectified.
- Summative essays: test the acquisition of knowledge and the ability to apply it in critical argument in relation to a specific question.
Teaching Methods and Learning Hours
Activity | Number | Frequency | Duration | Total/Hours | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seminars | 8 | Weekly | 2 hours | 16 | ■ |
Preparation and Reading | 134 | ||||
Total | 150 |
Summative Assessment
Component: Essay | Component Weighting: 100% | ||
---|---|---|---|
Element | Length / duration | Element Weighting | Resit Opportunity |
Essay - submitted on the first day of the following term | 4,000 words | 100% |
Formative Assessment:
A 1,500 word essay outline, to be submitted three days after the seminar in which the topic of the outline is discussed. This will normally be on the same topic on which the student has delivered a presentation. Presentation with written feedback via proforma.
■ Attendance at all activities marked with this symbol will be monitored. Students who fail to attend these activities, or to complete the summative or formative assessment specified above, will be subject to the procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University