Durham University
Programme and Module Handbook

Undergraduate Programme and Module Handbook 2014-2015 (archived)

Module THEO1901: God and Evil

Department: Theology and Religion

THEO1901: God and Evil

Type Open Level 1 Credits 20 Availability Available in 2014/15 Module Cap None. Location Durham

Prerequisites

  • None

Corequisites

  • None

Excluded Combination of Modules

  • <If other modules, please enter module code using 'Right Click, Insert module_code' or enter module title>

Aims

  • • To examine arguments of philosophers of religion about the compatibility of the existence of God and the presence of evil in the world, together with ethical and theological critiques of such arguments.
  • • To introduce students to broader reflections and debates on the nature of sin, suffering and evil in the Christian theological tradition.
  • • To enable students to explore differences between philosophical and theological reflections on evil.

Content

  • Can the presence of evil in the world be compatible with the existence of a good and powerful God? This is one of the chief preoccupations of philosophers of religion. In the first part of this module we examine modern philosophical arguments attempting either to disprove the existence of God or to defend theistic belief in light of suffering and evil, as well as some critiques of the genre of theodicy.
  • What has come to be called the problem of evil has never been as central a focus for the Christian theological tradition as it has become in modern philosophy of religion. In the second part of the module we will therefore broaden our focus to consider ways in which the relationship between God and evil has been understood in Christian theology. Topics may include the conception of evil as a privation of the good; conflicting theologies of sin; conceptions of suffering, including debates about whether God suffers; and Christian responses to the Holocaust.
  • The study of key texts, both ancient and modern, will be a central strand of the module. Students will be expected to engage with these texts on a weekly basis.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:
  • • A familiarity with some key arguments in the philosophy of religion, and their strengths and weaknesses.
  • • A knowledge of key and debated issues in the Christian tradition’s understanding of sin and evil.
  • • An understanding of differences between the disciplines of philosophy of religion and theology as regards purpose, context, and mode of argumentation
Subject-specific Skills:
  • • Capacity to evaluate, from multiple perspectives, philosophical and theological proposals
  • • Capacity to reflect on the practical and ethical import of philosophical and theological positions and arguments
Key Skills:
  • • Skills in the acquisition and interpretation of information through reading and research, and in the structured presentation of ideas.
  • • Skills in the development of arguments

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • • Lectures convey information and exemplify an approach to the subject-matter, enabling students to develop a clear understanding of the subject and to improve their skills in listening and in evaluating information.
  • • Seminars enhance subject-specific knowledge and understanding both through preparation and through interaction with students and staff, promoting awareness of different viewpoints and approaches.
  • • Examinations assess subject-specific knowledge and understanding, along with student skills in the structured presentation of information in written form under time constraints.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

Activity Number Frequency Duration Total/Hours
Lectures 22 1 per week 1 hour 22
Seminars 6 3 in Michaelmas, 3 in Epiphany 1 hour 6
Preparation and reading 172
Total 200

Summative Assessment

Component: Examination (at end of Michaelmas term) Component Weighting: 20%
Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
examination 45 min. 100%
Component: Examination (at end of Epiphany term) Component Weighting: 20%
Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
examination 45 min. 100%
Component: Examination (final) Component Weighting: 60%
Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
examination 2 hours 100%

Formative Assessment:


Attendance at all activities marked with this symbol will be monitored. Students who fail to attend these activities, or to complete the summative or formative assessment specified above, will be subject to the procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University