Undergraduate Programme and Module Handbook 2016-2017 (archived)
Module PHIL1041: READING PHILOSOPHY
Department: Philosophy
PHIL1041: READING PHILOSOPHY
Type | Open | Level | 1 | Credits | 20 | Availability | Available in 2016/17 | Module Cap | Location | Durham |
---|
Prerequisites
- None.
Corequisites
- At least one other module in Philosophy.
Excluded Combination of Modules
- None.
Aims
- To introduce students to issues of interpretation and comprehension in reading primary authors, through a detailed study of four thematically related texts.
Content
- The texts, from different periods in the history of philosophy, exhibit contrasting styles of philosophical argument, but are linked by a common theme: the subjective/objective distinction They are:
- Plato's "Protagoras"
- Hume's "Of the Standard of Taste"
- Sartre's "Existentialism and Humanism"
- Anscombe's "The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature"
Learning Outcomes
Subject-specific Knowledge:
- By the end of the module students will have knowledge and understanding of central arguments in the texts, of background information bearing on their interpretation.
Subject-specific Skills:
- grasp, analyse, evaluate and deploy subject-specific concepts and arguments
- locate, understand, assess and utilise pertinent philosophical (and, where appropriate, historical) sources
- interpret and criticise relevant texts.
Key Skills:
- express themselves clearly and succinctly in writing
- comprehend complex ideas, propositions and theories
- defend their opinions by reasoned argument
- seek out and identify appropriate sources of evidence and information
- tackle problems in a clear-sighted and logical fashion.
Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module
- Lectures deliver basic module-specific information, and provide a framework for further study.
- Tutorials provide opportunities for students to test their own understanding of the material studies, and defend and debate different opinions.
- Guided reading provides a structure within which students exercise and extend their abilities to make use of available learning resources.
- The Formative essays provide the opportunity for students to test their knowledge and understanding of the module content, and their ability to present and defend relevant arguments and theories, uninhibited by the need for summative assessment.
- The Summative essay tests knowledge and understanding of the course material, and the ability to identify and explain issues covered in the module, and, using relevant research material, to present different approaches to those issues, and make reasoned judgement on the merits and demerits of such approaches.
- The unseen examination tests students' overall knowledge and understanding of the module content at the end of the module, and their ability to bring it to bear on new problems under pressure of time.
Teaching Methods and Learning Hours
Activity | Number | Frequency | Duration | Total/Hours | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lectures | 22 | 1 per week | 1 hour | 22 | |
Tutorials | 10 | fortnightly | 1 hour | 10 | ■ |
Preparation and Reading | 168 | ||||
Total | 200 |
Summative Assessment
Component: Examination | Component Weighting: 60% | ||
---|---|---|---|
Element | Length / duration | Element Weighting | Resit Opportunity |
two-hour examination | 100% | ||
Component: Essay | Component Weighting: 40% | ||
Element | Length / duration | Element Weighting | Resit Opportunity |
1500 word essay | 100% |
Formative Assessment:
2 essays 1500 words each.
■ Attendance at all activities marked with this symbol will be monitored. Students who fail to attend these activities, or to complete the summative or formative assessment specified above, will be subject to the procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University