Durham University
Programme and Module Handbook

Undergraduate Programme and Module Handbook 2017-2018 (archived)

Module SGIA3201: THE ETHICS OF VIOLENCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Department: Government and International Affairs

SGIA3201: THE ETHICS OF VIOLENCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Type Open Level 3 Credits 20 Availability Not available in 2017/18 Module Cap Location Durham

Prerequisites

  • Any Level 2 SGIA module

Corequisites

  • None.

Excluded Combination of Modules

  • None.

Aims

  • This course will explore how far and in what we ways we can talk about ethics in relation to international relations. It will examine two important 'Realist' traditions in international relations, namely scepticism which denies the possibility of ethics, and internationalism which asserts a 'morality of states', and against these, discuss a third and more radical approach - cosmopolitanism. These approaches will be applied to three main areas concerning the use of violence: the ethics of warfare; human rights and the ethics of intervention; and the nature and status of international institutions, especially the UN.

Content

  • This module explores how far and in what ways ethics apply in connection with international relations, examining two important 'Realist' traditions: 'scepticism' and 'internationalism', and a more radical approach - 'cosmopolitanism'. These approaches are applied to three main areas concerning the use of violence: the ethics of warfare; human rights and the ethics of intervention; and international institutions, especially the UN. It thus enables students to place ethical aspects of international relations within the context of their earlier and more general studies and to appreciate the wide impact of ethical issues, concepts and theories in debates on the use of violence.
  • Students taking the course should develop knowledge and understanding of the material and the subject specific and key skills necessary for the production of essay, presentation, summative essay and project for assessment.

Learning Outcomes

Subject-specific Knowledge:
  • Through the module, students should acquire subject specific knowledge of:
  • important elements of political philosophy and normative political theory in the context of ethical debates over the use of violence in international relations
  • techniques and methods for theorising and investigating this area of political activity
  • the contested and dynamic nature of the politics of violence in international relations
  • the problems of analysing specific political events in appropriate context
  • the interaction of a range of actors in establishing conceptual and theoretical frameworks for thinking about violence, and how those more directly involved respond to and utilise these ideas.
Subject-specific Skills:
  • Through the module, students should also further develop subject specific skills, enabling them to:
  • identify and apply appropriate methods of political analysis in support of analytical argument, including the analysis and evaluation of competing theories, concepts and explanations
  • understand the significance of political ideals and ideas to the subject of the ethics of violence
Key Skills:
  • During the module, students will demonstrate and further develop important key skills. They should be able to:
  • effectively utilise diverse sources, including appropriate primary sources
  • retrieve and utilise a wide range of information using their own initiative
  • accurately assess the suitability and quality of resources
  • critically assess, and the description and defence of a personal viewpoint
  • plan and complete written and other assignments on-time and in appropriate formats
  • show flexibility in using knowledge and subject specific skills to meet the specific demands of the module
  • take responsibility for their own work.

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

  • Teaching and learning is by three lectures at the start of the module to introduce the main theoretical approaches the module deploys and then by eleven seminars distributed through the rest of the academic year. The lectures offer initial instruction in these approaches as they may not be familiar, imparting basic information necessary for the module and enabling staff to highlight the key differences that underpin much of the rest of the course.
  • Thereafter, the module uses seminars to set out the principal issues and questions raised by the topic and to provide a framework for subsequent debate, analysis and discussion exploring the contested and dynamic nature of the subject. Seminars offer an opportunity for considering the particular problems of context in this field, and the difficulties of weighing up a variety of factors in reaching analytical conclusions.
  • Formative assessment is by 2000-word essay. This offers students an opportunity to get to grips with the approach of the module via a familiar writing exercise. In particular, the module's emphasis on normative theory and the depth of disputes about how to understand the ethics of violence require some getting used to and this exercise offers students that chance.
  • Summative assessment is by essay and case-study project. Questions for the essay will be set requiring students to demonstrate knowledge of key political philosophical approaches to ethical judgement about violence in international relations and engage descriptively and analytically with key concepts and issues. Essays be connected to teaching sessions and associated reasing lists, but will require in-depth engagement that will typically require reading beyond that identified in module lists. The aims of the case-study project are for students to examine, analyse and assess the ethical issues surrounding the use of violence in a specific international political instance. The cases, chosen from a specified list, raise serious and controversial ethical issues about the use of violence and challenge students to come to a reasoned, well-argued judgement about both the international political response as it actually occurred, and to defend a superior course of action or draw more general lessons.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

Activity Number Frequency Duration Total/Hours
Lectures 4 Weekly at start 1 hour 4
Tutorials 9 Variable 2 hours 18
Preparation and Reading 178
Total 200

Summative Assessment

Component: Case-Study Project Component Weighting: 50%
Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
group case-study wiki from list of specified cases 5,000 words 100%
Component: Essay Component Weighting: 50%
Element Length / duration Element Weighting Resit Opportunity
essay 2,000 words 100%

Formative Assessment:

One 2,000 word essay.


Attendance at all activities marked with this symbol will be monitored. Students who fail to attend these activities, or to complete the summative or formative assessment specified above, will be subject to the procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University