Module ENGL2011: THEORY & PRACTICE OF LITERARY CRITICISM

Department: English Studies

ENGL2011: THEORY & PRACTICE OF LITERARY CRITICISM

Type	Open	Level	2	Credits	20	Availability	Available in 2024/2025	Module Cap		Location	Durham

Prerequisites

• At least one of the following modules: Introduction to Drama (ENGL1011), Introduction to the Novel (ENGL1061), Introduction to Poetry (ENGL1071).

Corequisites

• None.

Excluded Combination of Modules

• None.

Aims

• To introduce students to the presuppositions and principles of literary criticism and to issues of knowledge, value and ideology arising from the practice of reading.
• To develop an independent critical sense in students own practice of reading, contextualised against the history of theory and criticism.
• To develop this critical sense in conjunction with the reading and interpretation of literary texts.

Content

• The module introduces students to the intellectual context of modern criticism and to those traditions of thought and critical practice that have contributed to the formation of current debates about the nature of literature and of literary criticism.
• The modules primary focus is on theory and criticism of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, situated between the longer history of criticism and major contemporary debates.
• Specific issues that recur through engagement with different theoretical strands include the following:
• The relationship between texts, authors and readers.
• The issue of representation or the relationship between art and life.
• The social context of literature and the social function of criticism.
• The desirability and nature of aesthetic value judgements.
• Problems of interpretation.
• Questions of humanism and the role of the human sciences.

Learning Outcomes

• Students will be able to demonstrate knowledge of general issues in criticism including the relationship between texts, authors, and readers; the nature of aesthetic value judgements; definitions of the literary; the social context and function of literature.
• Students will also be able to identify and critique the presuppositions underlying specific critical concepts and recognise when those concepts are being used to develop interpretations of particular works.
• Knowledge and understanding of the distinctive character of texts written in the principal literary genres, the novel, poetry and drama.
• Knowledge of linguistic, literary, cultural and socio-historical contexts in which literature is written.
• Knowledge of useful and precise critical terminology.
• Awareness of the range and variety of approaches to literary study.

• Students studying this module will develop:
• critical skills in the close reading and analysis of texts.
• an ability to demonstrate knowledge of a range of texts, authors, and critical approaches.
• skills in argument and critical reading.
• an informed awareness of the formal and aesthetic dimensions of literature and an ability to offer cogent analysis of their workings in specific texts.
• a sensitivity to generic conventions and to the shaping effects on communication of historical circumstances, and to the affective power of language.
• an ability to articulate and substantiate an imaginative response to literature.
• skills of effective communication and argument.
• awareness of conventions of scholarly presentation, and bibliographic skills, including accurate citation of sources and consistent use of scholarly conventions of presentation.
• a command of a broad range of vocabulary and an appropriate critical terminology.
• an awareness of literature as a medium through which values are affirmed and debated.
• ability to engage in independent research at an appropriate level.

• Students studying this module will develop:
• a capacity to analyse critically.
• an ability to acquire complex information of diverse kinds in a structured and systematic way involving the use of distinctive interpretative skills derived from the subject.
• a competence in the planning and execution of essays.
• a capacity for independent thought and judgement and an ability to assess the critical ideas of others.
• skills in critical reasoning.
• an ability to handle information and argument in a critical manner.
• information-technology skills such as word-processing and electronic data access information.
• organisation and time-management skills.

Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module

• Lectures: enable students to gain subject-specific knowledge of cultural, aesthetic and intellectual issues in relation to individual works and authors, an area or period, or a theoretical or language-related topic; encourage students to be aware of the range and variety of approaches to literary study; present ideas and information to encourage, on the part of students, further thought and discussion
• Tutorials: enable students to explore, in a selective way, through small-group discussion, specific texts and topics (many of which will be addressed by lectures); to focus on selected literary issues and problems; and guide them in developing subject-specific analytical skills and knowledge
• Formative essays: are written on a text or texts, or a literary topic, and they require the student to demonstrate appropriate subject-specific knowledge and skills, such as the ability to articulate knowledge and understanding of concepts and theories relating to literary study. Written feedback is provided for all formative work. The essay is carefully marked with detailed annotations and constructive feedback. Students may arrange to discuss feedback with their tutors in a one-to-one session during the tutor's office hour. Formative essays allow for students to explore without risk different approaches to and perspectives on literary texts. Formative work is useful for revision purposes. Choice of topics encourages development of students’ capacity for independent thought and judgement.
• Essay feedback: encourages students to reflect critically and independently on their work
• Independent but directed reading in preparation for lectures and tutorials provides opportunity for students to enrich subject-specific knowledge and enhances their ability to develop appropriate subject-specific skills.
• Assessed essay: tests students’ ability to argue, respond and interpret, and to demonstrate subject-specific knowledge and skills such as appreciation of the power of imagination in literary creation and the close reading and analysis of texts. The assessed essay also tests that students have achieved stated learning outcomes and the ability to present word-processed work, observing scholarly conventions.
• Examination: tests the student's ability to present subject-specific knowledge, to select appropriate materials, and to construct and manage clear and effective arguments in a timed period; to demonstrate independent thinking, and test that students have achieved stated learning outcomes.

Teaching Methods and Learning Hours

Activity	Number	Frequency	Duration	Total/Hours
Lectures	21	1 Per Week	1 Hour	21
Seminars	8		1 Hour	8	■
Essay Feedback Session	1	1 in either Michaelmas Term or Epiphany Term	15 minutes	0.25	■
Preparation and Reading				170.75
Total				200

Summative Assessment

Examination 66.66% (two-hour). Students are required to answer two questions. Assessed Essay is 33.34% (2000 words in length) and is to be submitted at the end of the Epiphany term.

Component: Examination		Component Weighting: 66.66%
Element	Length / duration	Element Weighting	Resit Opportunity
Examination	2 hours	100%
Component: Assessed essay		Component Weighting: 33.34%
Element	Length / duration	Element Weighting	Resit Opportunity
Assessed essay	2000 words	100%

Formative Assessment:

1 essay of 1500-2000 words submitted in the Michaelmas term.

---

■ Attendance at all activities marked with this symbol will be monitored. Students who fail to attend these activities, or to complete the summative or formative assessment specified above, will be subject to the procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University