Undergraduate Programme and Module Handbook 2026-2027
Module GEOG3A37: Risk, Science and Communication
Department: Geography
GEOG3A37: Risk, Science and Communication
| Type | Open | Level | 3 | Credits | 10 | Availability | Available in 2026/2027 | Module Cap | Location | Durham |
|---|
Prerequisites
- Any level 2 Geography module
Corequisites
- None
Excluded Combination of Modules
- None
Aims
- This module aims to develop a critical understanding of how risk is communicated and interpreted across a range of social, cultural, and institutional contexts. It introduces foundational concepts in the study of risk and critically examines how communication practices may influence the perception, management, and response to risk in diverse settings. The module content emphasises that addressing complex risk issues requires moving beyond traditional disciplinary silos. Students will engage with examples from physical and human geography to understand how interdisciplinary collaboration and integration of diverse perspectives, including those of at-risk populations, are essential for designing effective and ethically responsible risk communication strategies.
Content
- The module begins by introducing risk as a concept, using the risk equation (comprising hazard, exposure, and vulnerability) as a framework for understanding the role of communication in risk reduction and management. Students will explore the idea that, although the characteristics of hazards are often fixed, communication can significantly influence exposure and vulnerability through its impact on awareness, preparedness, and behaviour. The module uses examples from both physical and human geography to consider how communication can be used to shape public responses to natural hazards such as volcanic eruptions, flooding, tropical cyclones and landslides, and how it influences understanding of, and response to, public health emergencies and climate change.
- The module examines the role of scientific knowledge in defining risk and informing policy decisions, exploring how expert modelling, assessment and advice underpin top-down management approaches such as regulation, emergency planning and national interventions, with varying levels of success. The module also considers how scientific ‘authority’ interacts with public trust and how these relationships vary across political and cultural contexts.
- The module explores how risk is communicated in practice and how effective strategies are designed and applied. It considers exchanges between practitioners, policymakers and the public, examining how framing, media representation and psychological factors shape perception and response, and how uncertainty is conveyed, highlighting both the importance of acknowledging uncertainty in risk communication strategies and the challenges of doing so in ways that maintain credibility and trust, and that guide appropriate action. Students will also engage with approaches for designing and evaluating communication strategies that influence exposure, vulnerability and resilience.
Learning Outcomes
Subject-specific Knowledge:
- By the end of the module, students will be able to:
- Understand how risk is conceptualized, and recognise how risk communication shapes perceptions, preparedness, and resilience.
- Demonstrate understanding of key theories and models of risk communication and their practical implications, including strategies for conveying uncertainty effectively.
- Appreciate the social, cultural, and institutional factors that shape risk perception and action, and how uncertainty may affect trust, credibility, and decision-making.
- Recognise the value of crossing disciplinary boundaries to address complex risk challenges, particularly where uncertainty is inherent.
Subject-specific Skills:
- Students will be able to:
- Analyse and compare risk communication strategies for different hazards and contexts.
- Evaluate the strengths, limitations, and ethical considerations of communication approaches, particularly in conveying uncertain or incomplete information.
- Apply theoretical frameworks to interpret and critique real-world communication practices, including methods for managing uncertainty in public messaging.
- Integrate insights from multiple disciplines to develop more effective communication strategies.
Key Skills:
- Students will develop the following:
- Critical thinking and analytical reasoning, including the ability to integrate perspectives from multiple disciplines.
- Skills in written communication tailored to varied, interdisciplinary audiences.
- The ability to synthesise evidence and theory across physical, social, and policy domains to inform communication strategies.
- The ability to communicate ideas clearly through multiple formats, including visual representations that convey complex factors that affect risk.
Modes of Teaching, Learning and Assessment and how these contribute to the learning outcomes of the module
- Teaching is delivered through lectures that incorporate key learning tasks and opportunities for discussion and synthesis across case studies and disciplinary perspectives. Self-directed learning is supported through provision of reading lists and online resources, enabling students to deepen understanding and develop critical analysis skills independently.
Teaching Methods and Learning Hours
| Activity | Number | Frequency | Duration | Total/Hours | Attendance Monitored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workshops | 8 | Weekly | 2 hours | 16 | Yes ■ |
| Preparation and Reading | 1 | 84 | |||
| Total | 100 |
Summative Assessment
| Component: Schematic figure and justification document | Component Weighting: 100% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Element | Length / duration | Element Weighting | Resit Opportunity |
| Assignment | Schematic figure and justification document - 3 x A4 pages | 100% | |
Formative Assessment:
Students will receive oral formative feedback as part of discussions of activities during lectures.
■ Students who do not attend monitored activities shown under Teaching Methods and Learning Hours, or who fail to complete the summative or formative assessment(s) specified above, may be subject to the Academic Progress procedures defined in the University's General Regulation V, and may be required to leave the University.